vulnerability scanners not effective? or just a false-positive?

From: Joel Jose (joeljose420@BonBon.net)
Date: Wed Mar 29 2006 - 11:03:51 EST


hy ppl,
           i was pen-testing a network. First i do a manual check with my
own methods, i use nmap,hping,metasploit,telnet,dig,whois..etc and then for
the confirmation i scan with nessus, just to be sure that i havent
overlooked any. But, today something very strange happened; i found a huge
vulnerability which could drastically compramise the network. The
directories were not protected. I could easily access the template
directory, and view the internal directory structure. I even got access to a
few files, which contained backup data of some of thier old employees. now,
if i had "known" the names of the *important* diectories, i am sure i would
have been able to access them as a piece of cake. Ofcourse the network is
safe as long as the attacker doesnt "learn" the name of the important
directories. But i think it is a very "huge" vulnerability. and nessus didnt
even give a hinch!!

and one more quest. How many of you think that the existance of the default
banners in services(eg apache default error pages) are a security threat, if
not high, atleast medium?. I do.

joel.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic

Concerned about Web Application Security?
As attacks through web applications continue to rise, you need to proactively
protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the most comprehensive
solutions to meet your application security penetration testing and
vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a managed
service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software (Cenzic Hailstorm).
Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can help you:
http://www.cenzic.com/forms/ec.php?pubid=10025
And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your
results from other product. Contact us at request@cenzic.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat Apr 12 2008 - 10:55:46 EDT