From: Dario Ciccarone (dciccaro) (dciccaro@cisco.com)
Date: Tue Sep 06 2005 - 17:13:49 EDT
For the 'why NAT and IPSec don't play nice together' question, go check
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3715.txt - and after reading that, check for
IPSec NAT-T (rfc-editor being a good place to start)
You mention deploying the VPN box behind an IPS device. Yes and no. What
are you trying to achieve? If your IPS box is inline, and does protocol
checking/normalization, that could work - the IPS would drop the
malformed packets and notify the management console (possibly). But do
you need/want to have that information?
Before deciding where to connect the VPN device (firewall, inline IPS,
nothing) we should decide what we want to achieve by doing it.
And there have been some comments about the VPN box interaction with
NAT. Deploying it behind a firewall != NATting - either because you
configure a 1:1 translation between public IP/private IP, or you use an
L2-firewall.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: misiu [mailto:misiu_@gmx.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 5:14 AM
> To: pen-test@securityfocus.com
> Subject: Re: Nortel Contivity 2600
>
> Dario Ciccarone (dciccaro) schrieb:
> > Putting the device in question behind the firewall isn't
> going to help
> > him with DoS attacks - unless those attacks are due to malformed
> > packets, _and_ the firewall in question drops the type of malformed
> > packets that would trigger the DoS.
> >
>
> Hmm, but if malformed packs come, is it not much better to
> set it behind
> an IPS? Firewall is not allways the right thing to protect, i guess.
> I don't really understand why Nat is not working....
> The Adresses of the tunnel are not encrypted, do they might have a
> checksum wich is altered through a NAT device?
>
> Do I see this right?
>
> misiu
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------
> Audit your website security with Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner:
>
> Hackers are concentrating their efforts on attacking
> applications on your
> website. Up to 75% of cyber attacks are launched on shopping
> carts, forms,
> login pages, dynamic content etc. Firewalls, SSL and
> locked-down servers are
> futile against web application hacking. Check your website
> for vulnerabilities
> to SQL injection, Cross site scripting and other web attacks
> before hackers do!
> Download Trial at:
>
> http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/pen-test_050831
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Audit your website security with Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner:
Hackers are concentrating their efforts on attacking applications on your
website. Up to 75% of cyber attacks are launched on shopping carts, forms,
login pages, dynamic content etc. Firewalls, SSL and locked-down servers are
futile against web application hacking. Check your website for vulnerabilities
to SQL injection, Cross site scripting and other web attacks before hackers do!
Download Trial at:
http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/pen-test_050831
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat Apr 12 2008 - 10:54:50 EDT