Re: IPS comparison

From: joekim13@securityfocus.com
Date: Fri Jul 29 2005 - 15:32:52 EDT

Next message: Matt: "RE: Exploit package analysis"
Previous message: Anthony: "Best Deal for Real Víagra!"
Maybe in reply to: bw: "IPS comparison"
Next in thread: Jarmon, Don R: "RE: IPS comparison"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is) Checkout Symantec's SNS , protocol anomaly + stateful signatures and updates via liveupdates

3com Tipping Point is also nice.

Yes you can configure this with out IP's to make them invisible

btw, all IPS,IDS should be configured in promisc mode w/ no ip. and mgmt traffic on a seperate interface. The above statement was a joke as some people tend to think you must put IP's on all boxes,

Next message: Matt: "RE: Exploit package analysis"
Previous message: Anthony: "Best Deal for Real Víagra!"
Maybe in reply to: bw: "IPS comparison"
Next in thread: Jarmon, Don R: "RE: IPS comparison"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat Apr 12 2008 - 10:54:40 EDT