From: Dotzero (dotzero@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Aug 08 2006 - 14:36:28 EDT
On 8/8/06, Diarmaid McManus <diarmaidmcmanus@gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually kluge, i think you'll find that that would be 'Its not
> nuclear weapons testing if there are no nuclear weapons', which, you
> will find, is actually not nuclear weapons testing.
>
> Penetration testing, by defenition, (and to keep many happy ill throw
> in IMO here) requires penetration of the systems you are testing, or
> at least proof that you _can_ penetrate them if you so wish.
>
> Yours,
> ~Diarmaid.
>
I have to agree with Kluge. Penetration testing is testing the ability
to penetrate. That is different than saying that penetration is a
prerequisite for testing.
You might have a very short report if you find no way of actually
penetrating but you still performed the test.
Dotzero
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
Concerned about Web Application Security?
Why not go with the #1 solution - Cenzic, the only one to win the Analyst's
Choice Award from eWeek. As attacks through web applications continue to rise,
you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the
most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration
testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a
managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software
(Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can
help you: http://www.cenzic.com/news_events/wpappsec.php
And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your
results from other product. Contact us at request@cenzic.com for details.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat Apr 12 2008 - 10:56:37 EDT