Re: Exploit through firewall question

From: Curt Purdy (purdy@tecman.com)
Date: Wed Jul 19 2006 - 16:43:32 EDT


> -----Original Message-----
> From: mr.nasty@ix.netcom.com
<snip>
> Mgmt wants me to only test through the firewall as if I'm
> coming in like the public. The rational is that the fw will
> prevent any attacks though ports other than 80 and 443.
> Therefore, there is no reason to change this configuration.
>
>
> What would be the reason to test behind the firewall?

Because of malicious insiders. I once owned and ran a regional ISP and
worked with the FBI hunting child pornographers several times. One of their
agents told me that 1 in 250 employees are "bad eggs". This was several
years ago and is probably worse now.

Curt Purdy CISSP, GSNA, GSEC, CNE, MCSE+I, CCDA
Information Security Officer
Information Systems Security
infosysec.net
443.846.4231

-------------

If you spend more on coffee than on IT security, you will be hacked.
What's more, you deserve to be hacked.
-- former White House cybersecurity czar Richard Clarke
 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic

Concerned about Web Application Security?
Why not go with the #1 solution - Cenzic, the only one to win the Analyst's
Choice Award from eWeek. As attacks through web applications continue to rise,
you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the
most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration
testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a
managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software
(Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can
help you: http://www.cenzic.com/news_events/wpappsec.php
And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your
results from other product. Contact us at request@cenzic.com for details.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat Apr 12 2008 - 10:56:21 EDT