From: woof@droopy.2y.net
Date: Tue May 07 2002 - 12:40:48 EDT
On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 10:19:11AM -0400, Sumit Dhar wrote:
[...]
> Also has anyone run arpspoof continiously for say something like 2-3
> days?? I had some issues due to that... anyone else with similar
> experience?
I've been running arpspoof for more than weeks and weeks because of one server
removed no possibility to change configuration on one of the client.
It has been working fine with 2 arpspoof running in background and some Source NAT
and Destination NAT
>
> I am not sure whether dsniff allows you to hijack connections.. but hunt
> does. I am sure that is one advantage of hunt over most other sniffers.
> Yes if your aim is just to monitor, either can be used. These days I
> have been playing around with lcrzoex.. which is pretty nifty too. :)
>
dsniff allow to hijack connections if you have a daemon listening somewhere else
on the network to receive network stream. (as sshmitm does).
Sorry for my poor englis
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus Security Intelligence Alert (SIA)
Service. For more information on SecurityFocus' SIA service which
automatically alerts you to the latest security vulnerabilities please see:
https://alerts.securityfocus.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat Apr 12 2008 - 10:53:20 EDT